[aspectc-user] FORWARDED: Template & namespace: bad combo for function resolution
Olaf Spinczyk
Olaf.Spinczyk at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Thu Feb 10 22:10:24 CET 2005
Hi,
Olaf Spinczyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here I forward a mail by Jeremy Buisson.
>
> Jeremy, please subscribe to the AspectC++ user mailing list before you
> post something. Posts by non-members are normally discarded automatically.
>
> Olaf
>
> -----
> Hi all,
>
> I found what I consider to be a bug in the PUMA C++ semantic analyser.
> Indeed, it does not seem to resolve functions that are templates and
> reside in a namespace. Typically, the following codes:
>
> struct S;
> namespace N {
> template <typename T> void f();
> }
> void g() {
> N::f<S>();
> }
>
> ends with "error: no matching function for call to `f'", whereas it
> should not. What is interesting is that if you either remove the
> namespace or the template, it works well ! The same if I put a "using
> namespace N;" directive and remove the "N::" prefix. It seems like this
> prefix is the real source of the problem.
>
> I did not find it in archives.
>
> My version : PUMA 0.9/g++
>
> Sincerely,
Matthias told me that this problem is fixed in version 0.9.1, which was
released a few minutes ago.
Olaf
More information about the aspectc-user
mailing list